Updated: TEHDAS identifies barriers to data sharing
European researchers and policymakers experience barriers in cross-border data sharing at the cost of health policies and innovations. The main obstacle is differing interpretations of the law.
Download the summary of results
The TEHDAS team conducted a literature review to analyse the existing evidence of barriers to data sharing in Europe. Of those identified, the majority were related to differing legal interpretations across Europe with the remainder focused on infrastructure, data management, trust and transparency.
Barriers with high-impact reoccurring issues were prioritised and selected for further exploration via detailed case studies. Twenty-three countries participated in the study, submitting 100 case studies on the following eleven priority barriers. Each barrier has been categorised under different issues.
Barrier description | Issue | |
---|---|---|
1 | Differences in governance and health data systems in Europe. | Infrastructure |
2 | European countries can set different derogations under the General Data Protection Regulation. | Legal |
3 | A lack of a common European interpretation of what constitutes ‘sufficient anonymisation’ to transform personal data to non-personal data. | Legal |
4 | Some European countries have national legislation/rules around health and research data in addition to GDPR. | Legal |
5 | European countries have different preferences as to the choice of legal basis for processing under the GDPR. | Legal |
6 | A lack of a common European interpretation of what constitutes ‘pseudonymisation’. | Legal |
7 | A lack of interoperability between data, hindering the ability to analyse multiple data sets within and between European countries. | Data |
8 | A lack of a common European interpretation of what is and is not ‘secondary use’ of data. | Legal |
9 | Identification of and access to suitable data sets is challenging. | Data |
10 | The use of different taxonomy and ontology codes across Europe to label the same health condition making comparisons between data sets challenging. | Data |
11 | A lack of standardised data sharing agreements for products developed by private sector providers using public health data to facilitate safe data sharing and protect public investment. | Trust |
Findings as evidence base for future work
Since February 2021, TEHDAS has been exploring the barriers to cross-border data sharing to provide the European Commission with concrete recommendations to resolve and/or mitigate these barriers within the European Health Data Space (EHDS).
This literature review is part of the TEHDAS work package Sharing data for health. A final report will be published in early 2022.
If you are interested in this work and would like to share your views, please contact: TEHDAS.sciensano@sciensano.be.
The countries that contributed to the case studies
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Ireland
- Latvia
- Luxembourg
- Moldova
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Poland
- Romania
- Serbia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- United Kingdom
The news item has been updated on 28 September 2021 with a summary report and an annex.
Share away!
Similar articles
-
TEHDAS’ proposals for promoting data altruism in the EHDS
-
TEHDAS’ recommendations to EU and member states to ensure EHDS sustainability
-
TEHDAS’ proposals for data quality and utility in EHDS
-
TEHDAS requires clarity for cross-border provisions in EHDS
-
EU-wide collaboration needed to optimise health data use for research and innovation
-
TEHDAS identifies needs for recommendations on cross-border collaboration between health data access bodies
-
TEHDAS’ proposals for the implementation of EHDS technical infrastructure
-
TEHDAS has brought dialogue, clarity and collaboration to developing the European health data space
-
Member states’ readiness to benefit from the EHDS regulation varies
-
TEHDAS consults stakeholders on EHDS technical infrastructure
-
TEHDAS consultation: Citizens support the secondary use of health data when it matches their ethical values
-
TEHDAS’ analysis on EHDS technical infrastructure
-
TEHDAS study: Member states to harmonise national legislation to enable the secondary use of health data
-
TEHDAS’ proposals for clarifying EHDS governance
-
TEHDAS assesses data interoperability standards
-
TEHDAS outlines key issues and considerations on data altruism
-
TEHDAS consults stakeholders on data altruism
-
TEHDAS consultation: people support health data use with solid safeguards
-
TEHDAS consults stakeholders on their expectations for safe use of health data
-
TEHDAS develops data quality recommendations
-
TEHDAS scrutinises data access processes in four countries
-
TEHDAS suggests minimum technical services for the European health data space
-
TEHDAS identifies funding options for secondary use of health data
-
TEHDAS establishes European guidelines for data partnerships
-
TEHDAS suggests options to overcome data barriers
-
TEHDAS provides recommendations on data interoperability
-
TEHDAS glossary
-
TEHDAS proposes European Health Data Space services
-
Individuals favour data sharing and use if benefits are clear
-
TEHDAS proposes ways to regulate data quality in the European Health Data Space
-
TEHDAS identifies user journey for cross-border health data sharing
-
TEHDAS probes matrix of data altruism definitions
-
TEHDAS scrutinises European data sharing initiatives
-
EU should rethink policies on health data access
-
TEHDAS analysis: Health data needs dedicated EU regulation